Juvenile Justice Essay

Should teenagers acc utilise of violent crimes be tried and true and sentenced as adults? Why or Why not?Adolescence and the death penalty, two lyric more(prenominal) commonly seen together as of late. With growing number of small adult being tried and sentenced as adults for violent crimes the question rises why did they commit does age matter to the jury when they are put on trial? accord to Paul Thompson, author of the article, Startling Finds on teenage Brains. In the article Thompson notes a massive qualifying of brain weave during the teenage years. While seek on brain _ create from raw stuff loss can help us to project teens better it cannot be used to excuse their violent or homicidal behavior. further it can be used as evidence that teenagers are not yet adults and the reasoned system shouldnt treat them as such However this research can not excuse teens of violent crimes, it does show that they are not yet adults and should not be treated as such (Thompson) . puerile being tried as adults are not competent decorous to stand trial, quoted from Laurence Steinberg taken from the article, Many Kids called Unfit for adult trial, by Greg Krikorian According to a Sacramento to Bee article written in 2003 youth are emotionally or intellectually unable to contribute to their own demurIt may common knowledge that a toddler doesnt understand complex situations like an adult would, but the truth is around half of the kids in the age range of 14 to 15 dont either. A study show that when compared with young adults children ages eleven to thirteen were more than three times are likely to be found naughtily impaired in intelligence the judicial process and aiding their own defense. But so we as teenage s know right from prostitute? As teen we are prone to do things that are frowned upon by adults.We are in the stages of life when we are most susceptible to catch _ pressure. And when more adults were faced with this question of whether or not ado lescents should be tried as adults they said they didnt fell that they had the POWER or right to judge whether someone should die or not. Kent scheidegger legal director of the buttoned-up criminal justice legal foundation said that vast absolute majority of teenagers even young ones know enough to be tried in adult court The notion that teenagers are not capable of understanding what is going on I find not credible in the case of mentally normal teenagers.1. What was most difficulty about this appellation?The most difficult was to truth what the study that the article gave you. 2. What was easiestEasiest about the engagement was the thesis statement3. What I analyse on completing this engagement was that there a lot or evidence and study that deal when through to see if teenage and be trial as adults and what the brains tissue in a teenage body. 4. The strengths of my argument were the evidence that I use in the article and quote on what other people severalize about the a rgument. 5. My weaknesses in my argument would be the end of the essay. 6. What I learn for this assignment that they a lot of teenage that do stupid things and the crimes that they do and why do they do. This whole assignment was should you trial teenage as adults.